↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Discrimination Task Reveals Differences in Neural Bases of Tinnitus and Hearing Impairment

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Discrimination Task Reveals Differences in Neural Bases of Tinnitus and Hearing Impairment
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026639
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatima T. Husain, Nathan M. Pajor, Jason F. Smith, H. Jeff Kim, Susan Rudy, Christopher Zalewski, Carmen Brewer, Barry Horwitz

Abstract

We investigated auditory perception and cognitive processing in individuals with chronic tinnitus or hearing loss using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Our participants belonged to one of three groups: bilateral hearing loss and tinnitus (TIN), bilateral hearing loss without tinnitus (HL), and normal hearing without tinnitus (NH). We employed pure tones and frequency-modulated sweeps as stimuli in two tasks: passive listening and active discrimination. All subjects had normal hearing through 2 kHz and all stimuli were low-pass filtered at 2 kHz so that all participants could hear them equally well. Performance was similar among all three groups for the discrimination task. In all participants, a distributed set of brain regions including the primary and non-primary auditory cortices showed greater response for both tasks compared to rest. Comparing the groups directly, we found decreased activation in the parietal and frontal lobes in the participants with tinnitus compared to the HL group and decreased response in the frontal lobes relative to the NH group. Additionally, the HL subjects exhibited increased response in the anterior cingulate relative to the NH group. Our results suggest that a differential engagement of a putative auditory attention and short-term memory network, comprising regions in the frontal, parietal and temporal cortices and the anterior cingulate, may represent a key difference in the neural bases of chronic tinnitus accompanied by hearing loss relative to hearing loss alone.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Trinidad and Tobago 1 1%
United States 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 27%
Neuroscience 12 13%
Psychology 12 13%
Engineering 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 17 18%