↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Differences among Major Taxa in the Extent of Ecological Knowledge across Four Major Ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Differences among Major Taxa in the Extent of Ecological Knowledge across Four Major Ecosystems
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Fisher, Nancy Knowlton, Russell E. Brainard, M. Julian Caley

Abstract

Existing knowledge shapes our understanding of ecosystems and is critical for ecosystem-based management of the world's natural resources. Typically this knowledge is biased among taxa, with some taxa far better studied than others, but the extent of this bias is poorly known. In conjunction with the publically available World Registry of Marine Species database (WoRMS) and one of the world's premier electronic scientific literature databases (Web of Science®), a text mining approach is used to examine the distribution of existing ecological knowledge among taxa in coral reef, mangrove, seagrass and kelp bed ecosystems. We found that for each of these ecosystems, most research has been limited to a few groups of organisms. While this bias clearly reflects the perceived importance of some taxa as commercially or ecologically valuable, the relative lack of research of other taxonomic groups highlights the problem that some key taxa and associated ecosystem processes they affect may be poorly understood or completely ignored. The approach outlined here could be applied to any type of ecosystem for analyzing previous research effort and identifying knowledge gaps in order to improve ecosystem-based conservation and management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Mexico 2 2%
France 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Turkey 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 81 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 46%
Environmental Science 17 17%
Computer Science 7 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 14 14%