Title |
Why Do Woodpeckers Resist Head Impact Injury: A Biomechanical Investigation
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0026490 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lizhen Wang, Jason Tak-Man Cheung, Fang Pu, Deyu Li, Ming Zhang, Yubo Fan |
Abstract |
Head injury is a leading cause of morbidity and death in both industrialized and developing countries. It is estimated that brain injuries account for 15% of the burden of fatalities and disabilities, and represent the leading cause of death in young adults. Brain injury may be caused by an impact or a sudden change in the linear and/or angular velocity of the head. However, the woodpecker does not experience any head injury at the high speed of 6-7 m/s with a deceleration of 1000 g when it drums a tree trunk. It is still not known how woodpeckers protect their brain from impact injury. In order to investigate this, two synchronous high-speed video systems were used to observe the pecking process, and the force sensor was used to measure the peck force. The mechanical properties and macro/micro morphological structure in woodpecker's head were investigated using a mechanical testing system and micro-CT scanning. Finite element (FE) models of the woodpecker's head were established to study the dynamic intracranial responses. The result showed that macro/micro morphology of cranial bone and beak can be recognized as a major contributor to non-impact-injuries. This biomechanical analysis makes it possible to visualize events during woodpecker pecking and may inspire new approaches to prevention and treatment of human head injury. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 60 | 15% |
United States | 56 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 23 | 6% |
India | 4 | <1% |
Belgium | 3 | <1% |
Australia | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 2 | <1% |
Japan | 2 | <1% |
Other | 27 | 7% |
Unknown | 229 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 360 | 88% |
Scientists | 31 | 8% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 1% |
Unknown | 265 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 17% |
Student > Master | 39 | 14% |
Researcher | 36 | 13% |
Professor | 15 | 5% |
Other | 42 | 15% |
Unknown | 46 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 23% |
Engineering | 64 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
Other | 49 | 17% |
Unknown | 64 | 23% |