↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Role of Stimulus Salience and Attentional Capture Across the Neural Hierarchy in a Stop-Signal Task

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
The Role of Stimulus Salience and Attentional Capture Across the Neural Hierarchy in a Stop-Signal Task
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026386
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carsten N. Boehler, Lawrence G. Appelbaum, Ruth M. Krebs, Ling-Chia Chen, Marty G. Woldorff

Abstract

Inhibitory motor control is a core function of cognitive control. Evidence from diverse experimental approaches has linked this function to a mostly right-lateralized network of cortical and subcortical areas, wherein a signal from the frontal cortex to the basal ganglia is believed to trigger motor-response cancellation. Recently, however, it has been recognized that in the context of typical motor-control paradigms those processes related to actual response inhibition and those related to the attentional processing of the relevant stimuli are highly interrelated and thus difficult to distinguish. Here, we used fMRI and a modified Stop-signal task to specifically examine the role of perceptual and attentional processes triggered by the different stimuli in such tasks, thus seeking to further distinguish other cognitive processes that may precede or otherwise accompany the implementation of response inhibition. In order to establish which brain areas respond to sensory stimulation differences by rare Stop-stimuli, as well as to the associated attentional capture that these may trigger irrespective of their task-relevance, we compared brain activity evoked by Stop-trials to that evoked by Go-trials in task blocks where Stop-stimuli were to be ignored. In addition, region-of-interest analyses comparing the responses to these task-irrelevant Stop-trials, with those to typical relevant Stop-trials, identified separable activity profiles as a function of the task-relevance of the Stop-signal. While occipital areas were mostly blind to the task-relevance of Stop-stimuli, activity in temporo-parietal areas dissociated between task-irrelevant and task-relevant ones. Activity profiles in frontal areas, in turn, were activated mainly by task-relevant Stop-trials, presumably reflecting a combination of triggered top-down attentional influences and inhibitory motor-control processes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Israel 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 21%
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 34%
Neuroscience 21 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 22 20%