↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Molecular Phylogenetic Signature of Clades in Decline

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The Molecular Phylogenetic Signature of Clades in Decline
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025780
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiago B. Quental, Charles R. Marshall

Abstract

Molecular phylogenies have been used to study the diversification of many clades. However, current methods for inferring diversification dynamics from molecular phylogenies ignore the possibility that clades may be decreasing in diversity, despite the fact that the fossil record shows this to be the case for many groups. Here we investigate the molecular phylogenetic signature of decreasing diversity using the most widely used statistic for inferring diversity dynamics from molecular phylogenies, the γ statistic. We show that if a clade is in decline its molecular phylogeny may show evidence of the decrease in the diversification rate that occurred between its diversification and decline phases. The ability to detect the change in diversification rate depends largely on the ratio of the speciation rates of the diversification and decline phases, the higher the ratio the stronger the signal of the change in diversification rate. Consequently, molecular phylogenies of clades in relative rapid decline do not carry a signature of their decreasing diversification. Further, the signal of the change in diversification rate, if present, declines as the diversity drop. Unfortunately, the molecular signature of clades in decline is the same as the signature produced by diversity dependent diversification. Given this similarity, and the inability of current methods to detect declining diversity, it is likely that some of the extant clades that show a decrease in diversification rate, currently interpreted as evidence for diversity dependent diversification, are in fact in decline. Unless methods can be developed that can discriminate between the different modes of diversification, specifically diversity dependent diversification and declining diversity, we will need the fossil record, or data from some other source, to distinguish between these very different diversity trajectories.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 7 6%
United States 5 4%
France 3 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 107 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Professor 9 7%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 70%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 10 8%