↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Deployable Laboratory Response to Influenza Pandemic; PCR Assay Field Trials and Comparison with Reference Methods
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025526
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy J. J. Inglis, Adam J. Merritt, Avram Levy, Patricia Vietheer, Richard Bradbury, Adam Scholler, Glenys Chidlow, David W. Smith

Abstract

The influenza A/H1N1/09 pandemic spread quickly during the Southern Hemisphere winter in 2009 and reached epidemic proportions within weeks of the official WHO alert. Vulnerable population groups included indigenous Australians and remote northern population centres visited by international travellers. At the height of the Australian epidemic a large number of troops converged on a training area in northern Australia for an international exercise, raising concerns about their potential exposure to the emerging influenza threat before, during and immediately after their arrival in the area. Influenza A/H1N1/09 became the dominant seasonal variant and returned to Australia during the Southern winter the following year.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Australia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 33 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Psychology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Engineering 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 27%