↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Implementing Prenatal Diagnosis Based on Cell-Free Fetal DNA: Accurate Identification of Factors Affecting Fetal DNA Yield

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
18 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Implementing Prenatal Diagnosis Based on Cell-Free Fetal DNA: Accurate Identification of Factors Affecting Fetal DNA Yield
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela N. Barrett, Bernhard G. Zimmermann, Darrell Wang, Andrew Holloway, Lyn S. Chitty

Abstract

Cell-free fetal DNA is a source of fetal genetic material that can be used for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Usually constituting less than 10% of the total cell free DNA in maternal plasma, the majority is maternal in origin. Optimizing conditions for maximizing yield of cell-free fetal DNA will be crucial for effective implementation of testing. We explore factors influencing yield of fetal DNA from maternal blood samples, including assessment of collection tubes containing cell-stabilizing agents, storage temperature, interval to sample processing and DNA extraction method used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 155 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 15%
Student > Master 21 13%
Other 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 20%
Engineering 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 30 19%