↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Diversity of Coral Reefs: What Are We Missing?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
18 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
651 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The Diversity of Coral Reefs: What Are We Missing?
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laetitia Plaisance, M. Julian Caley, Russell E. Brainard, Nancy Knowlton

Abstract

Tropical reefs shelter one quarter to one third of all marine species but one third of the coral species that construct reefs are now at risk of extinction. Because traditional methods for assessing reef diversity are extremely time consuming, taxonomic expertise for many groups is lacking, and marine organisms are thought to be less vulnerable to extinction, most discussions of reef conservation focus on maintenance of ecosystem services rather than biodiversity loss. In this study involving the three major oceans with reef growth, we provide new biodiversity estimates based on quantitative sampling and DNA barcoding. We focus on crustaceans, which are the second most diverse group of marine metazoans. We show exceptionally high numbers of crustacean species associated with coral reefs relative to sampling effort (525 species from a combined, globally distributed sample area of 6.3 m(2)). The high prevalence of rare species (38% encountered only once), the low level of spatial overlap (81% found in only one locality) and the biogeographic patterns of diversity detected (Indo-West Pacific>Central Pacific>Caribbean) are consistent with results from traditional survey methods, making this approach a reliable and efficient method for assessing and monitoring biodiversity. The finding of such large numbers of species in a small total area suggests that coral reef diversity is seriously under-detected using traditional survey methods, and by implication, underestimated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 651 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
Brazil 7 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Namibia 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Other 15 2%
Unknown 604 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 116 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 17%
Researcher 104 16%
Student > Master 101 16%
Other 29 4%
Other 99 15%
Unknown 93 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 294 45%
Environmental Science 125 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 30 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 1%
Other 45 7%
Unknown 107 16%