↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A New Paleozoic Symmoriiformes (Chondrichthyes) from the Late Carboniferous of Kansas (USA) and Cladistic Analysis of Early Chondrichthyans

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A New Paleozoic Symmoriiformes (Chondrichthyes) from the Late Carboniferous of Kansas (USA) and Cladistic Analysis of Early Chondrichthyans
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024938
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan Pradel, Paul Tafforeau, John G. Maisey, Philippe Janvier

Abstract

The relationships of cartilaginous fishes are discussed in the light of well preserved three-dimensional Paleozoic specimens. There is no consensus to date on the interrelationship of Paleozoic chondrichthyans, although three main phylogenetic hypotheses exist in the current literature: 1. the Paleozoic shark-like chondrichthyans, such as the Symmoriiformes, are grouped along with the modern sharks (neoselachians) into a clade which is sister group of holocephalans; 2. the Symmoriiformes are related to holocephalans, whereas the other Paleozoic shark-like chondrichthyans are related to neoselachians; 3. many Paleozoic shark-like chondrichthyans, such as the Symmoriiformes, are stem chondrichthyans, whereas stem and crown holocephalans are sister group to the stem and crown neoselachians in a crown-chondrichthyan clade. This third hypothesis was proposed recently, based mainly on dental characters.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Colombia 1 2%
Indonesia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 12 21%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 19%