↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Extending Brain-Training to the Affective Domain: Increasing Cognitive and Affective Executive Control through Emotional Working Memory Training

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
Title
Extending Brain-Training to the Affective Domain: Increasing Cognitive and Affective Executive Control through Emotional Working Memory Training
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024372
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Schweizer, Adam Hampshire, Tim Dalgleish

Abstract

So-called 'brain-training' programs are a huge commercial success. However, empirical evidence regarding their effectiveness and generalizability remains equivocal. This study investigated whether brain-training (working memory [WM] training) improves cognitive functions beyond the training task (transfer effects), especially regarding the control of emotional material since it constitutes much of the information we process daily. Forty-five participants received WM training using either emotional or neutral material, or an undemanding control task. WM training, regardless of training material, led to transfer gains on another WM task and in fluid intelligence. However, only brain-training with emotional material yielded transferable gains to improved control over affective information on an emotional Stroop task. The data support the reality of transferable benefits of demanding WM training and suggest that transferable gains across to affective contexts require training with material congruent to those contexts. These findings constitute preliminary evidence that intensive cognitively demanding brain-training can improve not only our abstract problem-solving capacity, but also ameliorate cognitive control processes (e.g. decision-making) in our daily emotive environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 3 <1%
Poland 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 357 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 22%
Researcher 58 15%
Student > Master 56 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 54 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 216 57%
Neuroscience 15 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 4%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Other 37 10%
Unknown 71 19%