↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Deciphering Network Community Structure by Surprise

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Deciphering Network Community Structure by Surprise
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024195
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo Aldecoa, Ignacio Marín

Abstract

The analysis of complex networks permeates all sciences, from biology to sociology. A fundamental, unsolved problem is how to characterize the community structure of a network. Here, using both standard and novel benchmarks, we show that maximization of a simple global parameter, which we call Surprise (S), leads to a very efficient characterization of the community structure of complex synthetic networks. Particularly, S qualitatively outperforms the most commonly used criterion to define communities, Newman and Girvan's modularity (Q). Applying S maximization to real networks often provides natural, well-supported partitions, but also sometimes counterintuitive solutions that expose the limitations of our previous knowledge. These results indicate that it is possible to define an effective global criterion for community structure and open new routes for the understanding of complex networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Japan 4 3%
India 3 2%
France 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Turkey 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 123 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 28%
Researcher 27 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 12%
Professor 13 9%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 14 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 43 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 12%
Physics and Astronomy 17 11%
Mathematics 12 8%
Engineering 10 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 20 13%