↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Towards a Physiology-Based Measure of Pain: Patterns of Human Brain Activity Distinguish Painful from Non-Painful Thermal Stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
Title
Towards a Physiology-Based Measure of Pain: Patterns of Human Brain Activity Distinguish Painful from Non-Painful Thermal Stimulation
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin E. Brown, Neil Chatterjee, Jarred Younger, Sean Mackey

Abstract

Pain often exists in the absence of observable injury; therefore, the gold standard for pain assessment has long been self-report. Because the inability to verbally communicate can prevent effective pain management, research efforts have focused on the development of a tool that accurately assesses pain without depending on self-report. Those previous efforts have not proven successful at substituting self-report with a clinically valid, physiology-based measure of pain. Recent neuroimaging data suggest that functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and support vector machine (SVM) learning can be jointly used to accurately assess cognitive states. Therefore, we hypothesized that an SVM trained on fMRI data can assess pain in the absence of self-report. In fMRI experiments, 24 individuals were presented painful and nonpainful thermal stimuli. Using eight individuals, we trained a linear SVM to distinguish these stimuli using whole-brain patterns of activity. We assessed the performance of this trained SVM model by testing it on 16 individuals whose data were not used for training. The whole-brain SVM was 81% accurate at distinguishing painful from non-painful stimuli (p<0.0000001). Using distance from the SVM hyperplane as a confidence measure, accuracy was further increased to 84%, albeit at the expense of excluding 15% of the stimuli that were the most difficult to classify. Overall performance of the SVM was primarily affected by activity in pain-processing regions of the brain including the primary somatosensory cortex, secondary somatosensory cortex, insular cortex, primary motor cortex, and cingulate cortex. Region of interest (ROI) analyses revealed that whole-brain patterns of activity led to more accurate classification than localized activity from individual brain regions. Our findings demonstrate that fMRI with SVM learning can assess pain without requiring any communication from the person being tested. We outline tasks that should be completed to advance this approach toward use in clinical settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 244 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 20%
Student > Master 36 14%
Researcher 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 19 7%
Other 60 23%
Unknown 42 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 24%
Neuroscience 30 11%
Psychology 29 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 9%
Engineering 23 9%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 55 21%