↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Assessing Google Flu Trends Performance in the United States during the 2009 Influenza Virus A (H1N1) Pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Assessing Google Flu Trends Performance in the United States during the 2009 Influenza Virus A (H1N1) Pandemic
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023610
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha Cook, Corrie Conrad, Ashley L. Fowlkes, Matthew H. Mohebbi

Abstract

Google Flu Trends (GFT) uses anonymized, aggregated internet search activity to provide near-real time estimates of influenza activity. GFT estimates have shown a strong correlation with official influenza surveillance data. The 2009 influenza virus A (H1N1) pandemic [pH1N1] provided the first opportunity to evaluate GFT during a non-seasonal influenza outbreak. In September 2009, an updated United States GFT model was developed using data from the beginning of pH1N1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Canada 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 296 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 26%
Researcher 50 16%
Student > Master 41 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 5%
Other 60 19%
Unknown 38 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 62 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 15%
Social Sciences 28 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 6%
Engineering 16 5%
Other 82 26%
Unknown 62 20%