↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A One-Step Miniprep for the Isolation of Plasmid DNA and Lambda Phage Particles

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A One-Step Miniprep for the Isolation of Plasmid DNA and Lambda Phage Particles
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023457
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Lezin, Yasuhiro Kosaka, H. Joseph Yost, Michael R. Kuehn, Luca Brunelli

Abstract

Plasmid DNA minipreps are fundamental techniques in molecular biology. Current plasmid DNA minipreps use alkali and the anionic detergent SDS in a three-solution format. In addition, alkali minipreps usually require additional column-based purification steps and cannot isolate other extra-chromosomal elements, such as bacteriophages. Non-ionic detergents (NIDs) have been used occasionally as components of multiple-solution plasmid DNA minipreps, but a one-step approach has not been developed. Here, we have established a one-tube, one-solution NID plasmid DNA miniprep, and we show that this approach also isolates bacteriophage lambda particles. NID minipreps are more time-efficient than alkali minipreps, and NID plasmid DNA performs better than alkali DNA in many downstream applications. In fact, NID crude lysate DNA is sufficiently pure to be used in digestion and sequencing reactions. Microscopic analysis showed that the NID procedure fragments E. coli cells into small protoplast-like components, which may, at least in part, explain the effectiveness of this approach. This work demonstrates that one-step NID minipreps are a robust method to generate high quality plasmid DNA, and NID approaches can also isolate bacteriophage lambda particles, outperforming current standard alkali-based minipreps.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Uruguay 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 302 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 76 24%
Researcher 58 18%
Student > Master 43 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Student > Postgraduate 11 3%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 65 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 4%
Chemistry 11 3%
Other 21 7%
Unknown 72 22%