↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Hard-Object Feeding in Sooty Mangabeys (Cercocebus atys) and Interpretation of Early Hominin Feeding Ecology

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Hard-Object Feeding in Sooty Mangabeys (Cercocebus atys) and Interpretation of Early Hominin Feeding Ecology
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023095
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Daegling, W. Scott McGraw, Peter S. Ungar, James D. Pampush, Anna E. Vick, E. Anderson Bitty

Abstract

Morphology of the dentofacial complex of early hominins has figured prominently in the inference of their dietary adaptations. Recent theoretical analysis of craniofacial morphology of Australopithecus africanus proposes that skull form in this taxon represents adaptation to feeding on large, hard objects. A modern analog for this specific dietary specialization is provided by the West African sooty mangabey, Cercocebus atys. This species habitually feeds on the large, exceptionally hard nuts of Sacoglottis gabonensis, stereotypically crushing the seed casings using their premolars and molars. This type of behavior has been inferred for A. africanus based on mathematical stress analysis and aspects of dental wear and morphology. While postcanine megadontia, premolar enlargement and thick molar enamel characterize both A. africanus and C. atys, these features are not universally associated with durophagy among living anthropoids. Occlusal microwear analysis reveals complex microwear textures in C. atys unlike those observed in A. africanus, but more closely resembling textures observed in Paranthropus robustus. Since sooty mangabeys process hard objects in a manner similar to that proposed for A. africanus, yet do so without the craniofacial buttressing characteristic of this hominin, it follows that derived features of the australopith skull are sufficient but not necessary for the consumption of large, hard objects. The adaptive significance of australopith craniofacial morphology may instead be related to the toughness, rather than the hardness, of ingested foods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 103 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 29%
Student > Master 14 13%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 47%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Environmental Science 8 7%
Arts and Humanities 6 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 15 14%