↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Cross-Species Affective Neuroscience Decoding of the Primal Affective Experiences of Humans and Related Animals

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Cross-Species Affective Neuroscience Decoding of the Primal Affective Experiences of Humans and Related Animals
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaak Panksepp

Abstract

The issue of whether other animals have internally felt experiences has vexed animal behavioral science since its inception. Although most investigators remain agnostic on such contentious issues, there is now abundant experimental evidence indicating that all mammals have negatively and positively-valenced emotional networks concentrated in homologous brain regions that mediate affective experiences when animals are emotionally aroused. That is what the neuroscientific evidence indicates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Brazil 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Hungary 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 410 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 22%
Researcher 63 14%
Student > Bachelor 47 11%
Student > Master 41 9%
Professor 34 8%
Other 94 21%
Unknown 63 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 131 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 23%
Neuroscience 46 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 7%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 78 18%