↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Modeling Symmetric Macromolecular Structures in Rosetta3

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Modeling Symmetric Macromolecular Structures in Rosetta3
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0020450
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank DiMaio, Andrew Leaver-Fay, Phil Bradley, David Baker, Ingemar André

Abstract

Symmetric protein assemblies play important roles in many biochemical processes. However, the large size of such systems is challenging for traditional structure modeling methods. This paper describes the implementation of a general framework for modeling arbitrary symmetric systems in Rosetta3. We describe the various types of symmetries relevant to the study of protein structure that may be modeled using Rosetta's symmetric framework. We then describe how this symmetric framework is efficiently implemented within Rosetta, which restricts the conformational search space by sampling only symmetric degrees of freedom, and explicitly simulates only a subset of the interacting monomers. Finally, we describe structure prediction and design applications that utilize the Rosetta3 symmetric modeling capabilities, and provide a guide to running simulations on symmetric systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 220 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 35%
Researcher 50 21%
Student > Master 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 5%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 31 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 70 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 24%
Chemistry 35 15%
Engineering 9 4%
Computer Science 8 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 35 15%