↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

What Is New for an Old Molecule? Systematic Review and Recommendations on the Use of Resveratrol

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Readers on

mendeley
436 Mendeley
Title
What Is New for an Old Molecule? Systematic Review and Recommendations on the Use of Resveratrol
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019881
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ole Vang, Nihal Ahmad, Clifton A. Baile, Joseph A. Baur, Karen Brown, Anna Csiszar, Dipak K. Das, Dominique Delmas, Carmem Gottfried, Hung-Yun Lin, Qing-Yong Ma, Partha Mukhopadhyay, Namasivayam Nalini, John M. Pezzuto, Tristan Richard, Yogeshwer Shukla, Young-Joon Surh, Thomas Szekeres, Tomasz Szkudelski, Thomas Walle, Joseph M. Wu

Abstract

Resveratrol is a natural compound suggested to have beneficial health effects. However, people are consuming resveratrol for this reason without having the adequate scientific evidence for its effects in humans. Therefore, scientific valid recommendations concerning the human intake of resveratrol based on available published scientific data are necessary. Such recommendations were formulated after the Resveratrol 2010 conference, held in September 2010 in Helsingør, Denmark.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Italy 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 414 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 16%
Researcher 57 13%
Student > Bachelor 51 12%
Other 28 6%
Other 90 21%
Unknown 71 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 105 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 81 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 6%
Chemistry 23 5%
Other 58 13%
Unknown 97 22%