↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

How Much Does Malaria Vector Control Quality Matter: The Epidemiological Impact of Holed Nets and Inadequate Indoor Residual Spraying

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
How Much Does Malaria Vector Control Quality Matter: The Epidemiological Impact of Holed Nets and Inadequate Indoor Residual Spraying
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea M. Rehman, Mike Coleman, Christopher Schwabe, Giovanna Baltazar, Abrahan Matias, Irina Roncon Gomes, Lee Yellott, Cynthia Aragon, Gloria Nseng Nchama, Themba Mzilahowa, Mark Rowland, Immo Kleinschmidt

Abstract

Insecticide treated nets (ITN) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) are the two pillars of malaria vector control in Africa, but both interventions are beset by quality and coverage concerns. Data from three control programs were used to investigate the impact of: 1) the physical deterioration of ITNs, and 2) inadequate IRS spray coverage, on their respective protective effectiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Pakistan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 165 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 20%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 40 23%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 17%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 34 20%