Title |
The Energy Computation Paradox and ab initio Protein Folding
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018868 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John C. Faver, Mark L. Benson, Xiao He, Benjamin P. Roberts, Bing Wang, Michael S. Marshall, C. David Sherrill, Kenneth M. Merz |
Abstract |
The routine prediction of three-dimensional protein structure from sequence remains a challenge in computational biochemistry. It has been intuited that calculated energies from physics-based scoring functions are able to distinguish native from nonnative folds based on previous performance with small proteins and that conformational sampling is the fundamental bottleneck to successful folding. We demonstrate that as protein size increases, errors in the computed energies become a significant problem. We show, by using error probability density functions, that physics-based scores contain significant systematic and random errors relative to accurate reference energies. These errors propagate throughout an entire protein and distort its energy landscape to such an extent that modern scoring functions should have little chance of success in finding the free energy minima of large proteins. Nonetheless, by understanding errors in physics-based score functions, they can be reduced in a post-hoc manner, improving accuracy in energy computation and fold discrimination. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 8% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 27% |
Researcher | 21 | 23% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 19% |
Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 27 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 15% |
Engineering | 5 | 5% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 11 | 12% |