↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Major Reduction in Anti-Malarial Drug Consumption in Senegal after Nation-Wide Introduction of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
7 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
Title
Major Reduction in Anti-Malarial Drug Consumption in Senegal after Nation-Wide Introduction of Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018419
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylla Thiam, Moussa Thior, Babacar Faye, Médoune Ndiop, Mamadou Lamine Diouf, Mame Birame Diouf, Ibrahima Diallo, Fatou Ba Fall, Jean Louis Ndiaye, Audrey Albertini, Evan Lee, Pernille Jorgensen, Oumar Gaye, David Bell

Abstract

While WHO recently recommended universal parasitological confirmation of suspected malaria prior to treatment, debate has continued as to whether wide-scale use of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) can achieve this goal. Adherence of health service personnel to RDT results has been poor in some settings, with little impact on anti-malarial drug consumption. The Senegal national malaria control programme introduced universal parasite-based diagnosis using malaria RDTs from late 2007 in all public health facilities. This paper assesses the impact of this programme on anti-malarial drug consumption and disease reporting.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Nigeria 2 1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 179 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Lecturer 14 7%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Social Sciences 15 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 34 18%