↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy vs. Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
431 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy vs. Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erik Hedman, Gerhard Andersson, Brjánn Ljótsson, Erik Andersson, Christian Rück, Ewa Mörtberg, Nils Lindefors

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT) is an effective, well-established, but not widely available treatment for social anxiety disorder (SAD). Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (ICBT) has the potential to increase availability and facilitate dissemination of therapeutic services for SAD. However, ICBT for SAD has not been directly compared with in-person treatments such as CBGT and few studies investigating ICBT have been conducted in clinical settings. Our aim was to investigate if ICBT is at least as effective as CBGT for SAD when treatments are delivered in a psychiatric setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 431 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 418 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 18%
Student > Bachelor 67 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 15%
Researcher 47 11%
Student > Postgraduate 33 8%
Other 73 17%
Unknown 69 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 236 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 11%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 27 6%
Unknown 90 21%