↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Differences in Abundances of Cell-Signalling Proteins in Blood Reveal Novel Biomarkers for Early Detection Of Clinical Alzheimer's Disease

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Differences in Abundances of Cell-Signalling Proteins in Blood Reveal Novel Biomarkers for Early Detection Of Clinical Alzheimer's Disease
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017481
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mateus Rocha de Paula, Martín Gómez Ravetti, Regina Berretta, Pablo Moscato

Abstract

In November 2007 a study published in Nature Medicine proposed a simple test based on the abundance of 18 proteins in blood to predict the onset of clinical symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) two to six years before these symptoms manifest. Later, another study, published in PLoS ONE, showed that only five proteins (IL-1, IL-3, EGF, TNF- and G-CSF) have overall better prediction accuracy. These classifiers are based on the abundance of 120 proteins. Such values were standardised by a Z-score transformation, which means that their values are relative to the average of all others.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
France 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 58 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Computer Science 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 14 23%