↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

It's the Recipient That Counts: Spending Money on Strong Social Ties Leads to Greater Happiness than Spending on Weak Social Ties

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
It's the Recipient That Counts: Spending Money on Strong Social Ties Leads to Greater Happiness than Spending on Weak Social Ties
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara B. Aknin, Gillian M. Sandstrom, Elizabeth W. Dunn, Michael I. Norton

Abstract

Previous research has shown that spending money on others (prosocial spending) increases happiness. But, do the happiness gains depend on who the money is spent on? Sociologists have distinguished between strong ties with close friends and family and weak ties--relationships characterized by less frequent contact, lower emotional intensity, and limited intimacy. We randomly assigned participants to reflect on a time when they spent money on either a strong social tie or a weak social tie. Participants reported higher levels of positive affect after recalling a time they spent on a strong tie versus a weak tie. The level of intimacy in the relationship was more important than the type of relationship; there was no significant difference in positive affect after recalling spending money on a family member instead of a friend. These results add to the growing literature examining the factors that moderate the link between prosocial behaviour and happiness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 230 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 18%
Student > Master 37 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 15%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 42 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 116 49%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 8%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 42 18%