↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Adaptive Avoidance of Reef Noise

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Adaptive Avoidance of Reef Noise
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016625
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen D. Simpson, Andrew N. Radford, Edward J. Tickle, Mark G. Meekan, Andrew G. Jeffs

Abstract

Auditory information is widely used throughout the animal kingdom in both terrestrial and aquatic environments. Some marine species are dependent on reefs for adult survival and reproduction, and are known to use reef noise to guide orientation towards suitable habitat. Many others that forage in food-rich inshore waters would, however, benefit from avoiding the high density of predators resident on reefs, but nothing is known about whether acoustic cues are used in this context. By analysing a sample of nearly 700,000 crustaceans, caught during experimental playbacks in light traps in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon, we demonstrate an auditory capability in a broad suite of previously neglected taxa, and provide the first evidence in any marine organisms that reef noise can act as a deterrent. In contrast to the larvae of species that require reef habitat for future success, which showed an attraction to broadcasted reef noise, taxa with a pelagic or nocturnally emergent lifestyle actively avoided it. Our results suggest that a far greater range of invertebrate taxa than previously thought can respond to acoustic cues, emphasising yet further the potential negative impact of globally increasing levels of underwater anthropogenic noise.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 192 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Researcher 28 14%
Student > Master 28 14%
Other 14 7%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 42%
Environmental Science 42 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 6%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Psychology 3 1%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 39 19%