↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and the “Elephant Man's” Disease: The Confusion Persists: An Ethnographic Study

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and the “Elephant Man's” Disease: The Confusion Persists: An Ethnographic Study
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016409
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire-Marie Legendre, Catherine Charpentier-Côté, Régen Drouin, Chantal Bouffard

Abstract

Background: In 1986, two Canadian geneticists had demonstrated that Joseph Merrick, better known as the Elephant Man, suffered from the Proteus syndrome and not from neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), as was alleged by dermatologist Parkes in 1909. Despite this and although the two diseases differ at several levels: prevalence, diagnostic criteria, clinical manifestations and transmission, the confusion between NF1 and the "elephant man's" disease continues in medical and social representations by current linguistic usage, and in some media reports. With this article, we want to 1) document the persistence and extent of this fallacy, 2) identify certain critical factors that contribute to its persistence, and 3) evaluate its impact on the health and well being of patients with NF1 and their family members.Methodology: Participant observation in the course of an ethnographic study on intergenerational dialogue between individuals with neurofibromatosis and their parents - Analysis of the scientific literature and of pinpoint articles in the print and online news media.Findings: Our findings show that because physicians have little knowledge about NF1, several print and online news media and a lot of physicians continue to make the confusion between NF1 and the disease the "elephant man". This misconception contributes to misinformation about the disease, feeding prejudices against affected patients, exacerbating the negative impacts of the disease on their quality of life, their cognitive development, their reproductive choices, as well as depriving them of proper care and appropriate genetic counseling.Conclusion: If family physicians and pediatricians were properly informed about the disease, they could refer their patients with NF1 to NF clinics and to specialists. Thus, patients and their family members would benefit from better-tailored clinical management of their cases, perhaps even optimal management. [corrected]

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Psychology 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 28%