↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Non-invasive Predictors of Human Cortical Bone Mechanical Properties: T2-Discriminated 1H NMR Compared with High Resolution X-ray

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Non-invasive Predictors of Human Cortical Bone Mechanical Properties: T2-Discriminated 1H NMR Compared with High Resolution X-ray
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016359
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Adam Horch, Daniel F. Gochberg, Jeffry S. Nyman, Mark D. Does

Abstract

Recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have enabled clinical imaging of human cortical bone, providing a potentially powerful new means for assessing bone health with molecular-scale sensitivities unavailable to conventional X-ray-based diagnostics. To this end, (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and high-resolution X-ray signals from human cortical bone samples were correlated with mechanical properties of bone. Results showed that (1)H NMR signals were better predictors of yield stress, peak stress, and pre-yield toughness than were the X-ray derived signals. These (1)H NMR signals can, in principle, be extracted from clinical MRI, thus offering the potential for improved clinical assessment of fracture risk.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 60 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Physics and Astronomy 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 17 27%