↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Novel Method for Volumetric MRI Response Assessment of Enhancing Brain Tumors

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
A Novel Method for Volumetric MRI Response Assessment of Enhancing Brain Tumors
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles W. Kanaly, Dale Ding, Ankit I. Mehta, Anthony F. Waller, Ian Crocker, Annick Desjardins, David A. Reardon, Allan H. Friedman, Darell D. Bigner, John H. Sampson

Abstract

Current radiographic response criteria for brain tumors have difficulty describing changes surrounding postoperative resection cavities. Volumetric techniques may offer improved assessment, however usually are time-consuming, subjective and require expert opinion and specialized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. We describe the application of a novel volumetric software algorithm that is nearly fully automated and uses standard T1 pre- and post-contrast MRI sequences. T1-weighted pre- and post-contrast images are automatically fused and normalized. The tumor region of interest is grossly outlined by the user. An atlas of the nasal mucosa is automatically detected and used to normalize levels of enhancement. The volume of enhancing tumor is then automatically calculated. We tested the ability of our method to calculate enhancing tumor volume with resection cavity collapse and when the enhancing tumor is obscured by subacute blood in a resection cavity. To determine variability in results, we compared narrowly-defined tumor regions with tumor regions that include adjacent meningeal enhancement and also compared different contrast enhancement threshold levels used for the automatic calculation of enhancing tumor volume. Our method quantified enhancing tumor volume despite resection cavity collapse. It detected tumor volume increase in the midst of blood products that incorrectly caused decreased measurements by other techniques. Similar trends in volume changes across scans were seen with inclusion or exclusion of meningeal enhancement and despite different automated thresholds for tissue enhancement. Our approach appears to overcome many of the challenges with response assessment of enhancing brain tumors and warrants further examination and validation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 37%
Engineering 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Computer Science 2 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%