↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Electrosensitive Spatial Vectors in Elasmobranch Fishes: Implications for Source Localization
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariel C. Rivera-Vicente, Josiah Sewell, Timothy C. Tricas

Abstract

The electrosense of sharks and rays is used to detect weak dipole-like bioelectric fields of prey, mates and predators, and several models propose a use for the detection of streaming ocean currents and swimming-induced fields for geomagnetic orientation. We assessed pore distributions, canal vectors, complementarity and possible evolutionary divergent functions for ampullary clusters in two sharks, the scalloped hammerhead (Sphyrna lewini) and the sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus), and the brown stingray (Dasyatis lata). Canal projections were determined from measured coordinates of each electrosensory pore and corresponding ampulla relative to the body axis. These species share three ampullary groups: the buccal (BUC), mandibular (MAN) and superficial ophthalmic (SO), which is subdivided into anterior (SOa) and posterior (SOp) in sharks. The stingray also has a hyoid (HYO) cluster. The SOp in both sharks contains the longest (most sensitive) canals with main projections in the posterior-lateral quadrants of the horizontal plane. In contrast, stingray SO canals are few and short with the posterior-lateral projections subsumed by the HYO. There was strong projection coincidence by BUC and SOp canals in the posterior lateral quadrant of the hammerhead shark, and laterally among the stingray BUC and HYO. The shark SOa and stingray SO and BUC contain short canals located anterior to the mouth for detection of prey at close distance. The MAN canals of all species project in anterior or posterior directions behind the mouth and likely coordinate prey capture. Vertical elevation was greatest in the BUC of the sandbar shark, restricted by the hammerhead cephalofoil and extremely limited in the dorsoventrally flattened stingray. These results are consistent with the functional subunit hypothesis that predicts specialized ampullary functions for processing of weak dipole and geomagnetic induced fields, and provides an anatomical basis for future experiments on central processing of different forms of relevant electric stimuli.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 23%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 45%
Environmental Science 10 12%
Engineering 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 14 17%