↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

An Investigation of Racing Performance and Whip Use by Jockeys in Thoroughbred Races

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
41 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
Title
An Investigation of Racing Performance and Whip Use by Jockeys in Thoroughbred Races
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015622
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Evans, Paul McGreevy

Abstract

Concerns have been expressed concerning animal-welfare issues associated with whip use during Thoroughbred races. However, there have been no studies of relationships between performance and use of whips in Thoroughbred racing. Our aim was to describe whip use and the horses' performance during races, and to investigate associations between whip use and racing performance. Under the Australian Racing Board (ARB) rules, only horses that are in contention can be whipped, so we expected that whippings would be associated with superior performance, and those superior performances would be explained by an effect of whipping on horse velocities in the final 400 m of the race. We were also interested to determine whether performance in the latter sections of a race was associated with performance in the earlier sections of a race. Measurements of whip strikes and sectional times during each of the final three 200 metre (m) sections of five races were analysed. Jockeys in more advanced placings at the final 400 and 200 m positions in the races whipped their horses more frequently. Horses, on average, achieved highest speeds in the 600 to 400 m section when there was no whip use, and the increased whip use was most frequent in the final two 200 m sections when horses were fatigued. This increased whip use was not associated with significant variation in velocity as a predictor of superior placing at the finish.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 24%
Student > Master 18 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 38%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 11%
Sports and Recreations 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 26 30%