↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Nearest Template Prediction: A Single-Sample-Based Flexible Class Prediction with Confidence Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Nearest Template Prediction: A Single-Sample-Based Flexible Class Prediction with Confidence Assessment
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015543
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yujin Hoshida

Abstract

Gene-expression signature-based disease classification and clinical outcome prediction has not been widely introduced in clinical medicine as initially expected, mainly due to the lack of extensive validation needed for its clinical deployment. Obstacles include variable measurement in microarray assay, inconsistent assay platform, analytical requirement for comparable pair of training and test datasets, etc. Furthermore, as medical device helping clinical decision making, the prediction needs to be made for each single patient with a measure of its reliability. To address these issues, there is a need for flexible prediction method less sensitive to difference in experimental and analytical conditions, applicable to each single patient, and providing measure of prediction confidence. The nearest template prediction (NTP) method provides a convenient way to make class prediction with assessment of prediction confidence computed in each single patient's gene-expression data using only a list of signature genes and a test dataset. We demonstrate that the method can be flexibly applied to cross-platform, cross-species, and multiclass predictions without any optimization of analysis parameters.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 153 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Master 10 6%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 11%
Computer Science 6 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 35 22%