↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Challenges in Identifying Sites Climatically Matched to the Native Ranges of Animal Invaders

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Challenges in Identifying Sites Climatically Matched to the Native Ranges of Animal Invaders
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gordon H. Rodda, Catherine S. Jarnevich, Robert N. Reed

Abstract

Species distribution models are often used to characterize a species' native range climate, so as to identify sites elsewhere in the world that may be climatically similar and therefore at risk of invasion by the species. This endeavor provoked intense public controversy over recent attempts to model areas at risk of invasion by the Indian Python (Python molurus). We evaluated a number of MaxEnt models on this species to assess MaxEnt's utility for vertebrate climate matching.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 5%
Mexico 5 2%
Brazil 5 2%
Germany 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Colombia 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 268 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 71 22%
Student > Master 63 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 18%
Student > Bachelor 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 36 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 185 58%
Environmental Science 68 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 3%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Other 11 3%
Unknown 36 11%