↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
8 blogs
twitter
46 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
Title
A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014331
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel

Abstract

This paper presents the first meta-analysis for the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of journal peer reviews. IRR is defined as the extent to which two or more independent reviews of the same scientific document agree.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 5%
Germany 4 2%
Spain 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 138 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Master 22 13%
Professor 15 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 17 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 22%
Social Sciences 26 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 8%
Computer Science 12 7%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 27 16%