↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

First Evidence for Adoption in California Sea Lions

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
First Evidence for Adoption in California Sea Lions
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0013873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramona Flatz, Leah R. Gerber

Abstract

Demographic parameters such as birth and death rates determine the persistence of populations. Understanding the mechanisms that influence these rates is essential to developing effective management strategies. Alloparental behavior, or the care of non-filial young, has been documented in many species and has been shown to influence offspring survival. However, the role of alloparental behavior in maintaining population viability has not been previously studied. Here, we provide the first evidence for adoption in California sea lions and show that adoption potentially works to maintain a high survival rate of young and may ultimately contribute to population persistence. Alloparental behavior should have a positive effect on the population growth rate when the sum of the effects on fitness for the alloparent and beneficiary is positive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
China 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 46 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Master 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 54%
Environmental Science 8 15%
Psychology 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 15%