| Title |
An Analysis of Preliminary and Post-Discussion Priority Scores for Grant Applications Peer Reviewed by the Center for Scientific Review at the NIH
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0013526 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael R. Martin, Andrea Kopstein, Joy M. Janice |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 17% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 26% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Psychology | 2 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 22% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |