↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Complex Exon-Intron Marking by Histone Modifications Is Not Determined Solely by Nucleosome Distribution
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012339
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pawandeep Dhami, Peter Saffrey, Alexander W. Bruce, Shane C. Dillon, Kelly Chiang, Nicolas Bonhoure, Christoph M. Koch, Jackie Bye, Keith James, Nicola S. Foad, Peter Ellis, Nicholas A. Watkins, Willem H. Ouwehand, Cordelia Langford, Robert M. Andrews, Ian Dunham, David Vetrie

Abstract

It has recently been shown that nucleosome distribution, histone modifications and RNA polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy show preferential association with exons ("exon-intron marking"), linking chromatin structure and function to co-transcriptional splicing in a variety of eukaryotes. Previous ChIP-sequencing studies suggested that these marking patterns reflect the nucleosomal landscape. By analyzing ChIP-chip datasets across the human genome in three cell types, we have found that this marking system is far more complex than previously observed. We show here that a range of histone modifications and Pol II are preferentially associated with exons. However, there is noticeable cell-type specificity in the degree of exon marking by histone modifications and, surprisingly, this is also reflected in some histone modifications patterns showing biases towards introns. Exon-intron marking is laid down in the absence of transcription on silent genes, with some marking biases changing or becoming reversed for genes expressed at different levels. Furthermore, the relationship of this marking system with splicing is not simple, with only some histone modifications reflecting exon usage/inclusion, while others mirror patterns of exon exclusion. By examining nucleosomal distributions in all three cell types, we demonstrate that these histone modification patterns cannot solely be accounted for by differences in nucleosome levels between exons and introns. In addition, because of inherent differences between ChIP-chip array and ChIP-sequencing approaches, these platforms report different nucleosome distribution patterns across the human genome. Our findings confound existing views and point to active cellular mechanisms which dynamically regulate histone modification levels and account for exon-intron marking. We believe that these histone modification patterns provide links between chromatin accessibility, Pol II movement and co-transcriptional splicing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 108 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 37%
Researcher 27 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 10%
Student > Master 8 7%
Professor 7 6%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 7 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 9 8%