↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Apparent Non-Canonical Trans-Splicing Is Generated by Reverse Transcriptase In Vitro

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Apparent Non-Canonical Trans-Splicing Is Generated by Reverse Transcriptase In Vitro
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Houseley, David Tollervey

Abstract

Trans-splicing, the in vivo joining of two independently transcribed RNA molecules, is well characterized in lower eukaryotes, but was long thought absent from metazoans. However, recent bioinformatic analyses of EST sequences suggested widespread trans-splicing in mammals. These apparently spliced transcripts generally lacked canonical splice sites, leading us to question their authenticity. Particularly, the native ability of reverse transcriptase enzymes to template switch during transcription could produce apparently trans-spliced sequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 154 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 30%
Researcher 41 25%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 26%
Computer Science 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 16 10%