↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

A Systematic Review on the Diagnosis of Pediatric Bacterial Pneumonia: When Gold Is Bronze

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
15 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
A Systematic Review on the Diagnosis of Pediatric Bacterial Pneumonia: When Gold Is Bronze
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011989
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Lynch, Liza Bialy, James D. Kellner, Martin H. Osmond, Terry P. Klassen, Tamara Durec, Robin Leicht, David W. Johnson

Abstract

In developing countries, pneumonia is one of the leading causes of death in children under five years of age and hence timely and accurate diagnosis is critical. In North America, pneumonia is also a common source of childhood morbidity and occasionally mortality. Clinicians traditionally have used the chest radiograph as the gold standard in the diagnosis of pneumonia, but they are becoming increasingly aware that it is not ideal. Numerous studies have shown that chest radiography findings lack precision in defining the etiology of childhood pneumonia. There is no single test that reliably distinguishes bacterial from non-bacterial causes. These factors have resulted in clinicians historically using a combination of physical signs and chest radiographs as a 'gold standard', though this combination of tests has been shown to be imperfect for diagnosis and assigning treatment. The objectives of this systematic review are to: 1) identify and categorize studies that have used single or multiple tests as a gold standard for assessing accuracy of other tests, and 2) given the 'gold standard' used, determine the accuracy of these other tests for diagnosing childhood bacterial pneumonia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 200 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Postgraduate 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 55 27%
Unknown 39 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Engineering 7 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 49 24%