↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

An Overview of Marine Biodiversity in United States Waters

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An Overview of Marine Biodiversity in United States Waters
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011914
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daphne Fautin, Penelope Dalton, Lewis S. Incze, Jo-Ann C. Leong, Clarence Pautzke, Andrew Rosenberg, Paul Sandifer, George Sedberry, John W. Tunnell, Isabella Abbott, Russell E. Brainard, Melissa Brodeur, Lucius G. Eldredge, Michael Feldman, Fabio Moretzsohn, Peter S. Vroom, Michelle Wainstein, Nicholas Wolff

Abstract

Marine biodiversity of the United States (U.S.) is extensively documented, but data assembled by the United States National Committee for the Census of Marine Life demonstrate that even the most complete taxonomic inventories are based on records scattered in space and time. The best-known taxa are those of commercial importance. Body size is directly correlated with knowledge of a species, and knowledge also diminishes with distance from shore and depth. Measures of biodiversity other than species diversity, such as ecosystem and genetic diversity, are poorly documented. Threats to marine biodiversity in the U.S. are the same as those for most of the world: overexploitation of living resources; reduced water quality; coastal development; shipping; invasive species; rising temperature and concentrations of carbon dioxide in the surface ocean, and other changes that may be consequences of global change, including shifting currents; increased number and size of hypoxic or anoxic areas; and increased number and duration of harmful algal blooms. More information must be obtained through field and laboratory research and monitoring that involve innovative sampling techniques (such as genetics and acoustics), but data that already exist must be made accessible. And all data must have a temporal component so trends can be identified. As data are compiled, techniques must be developed to make certain that scales are compatible, to combine and reconcile data collected for various purposes with disparate gear, and to automate taxonomic changes. Information on biotic and abiotic elements of the environment must be interactively linked. Impediments to assembling existing data and collecting new data on marine biodiversity include logistical problems as well as shortages in finances and taxonomic expertise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Canada 4 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 311 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 93 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 15%
Student > Master 47 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 9%
Professor 18 5%
Other 62 18%
Unknown 42 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 154 45%
Environmental Science 78 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 20 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 28 8%
Unknown 53 15%