↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Good and Bad in the Hands of Politicians: Spontaneous Gestures during Positive and Negative Speech

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Good and Bad in the Hands of Politicians: Spontaneous Gestures during Positive and Negative Speech
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011805
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Casasanto, Kyle Jasmin

Abstract

According to the body-specificity hypothesis, people with different bodily characteristics should form correspondingly different mental representations, even in highly abstract conceptual domains. In a previous test of this proposal, right- and left-handers were found to associate positive ideas like intelligence, attractiveness, and honesty with their dominant side and negative ideas with their non-dominant side. The goal of the present study was to determine whether 'body-specific' associations of space and valence can be observed beyond the laboratory in spontaneous behavior, and whether these implicit associations have visible consequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 144 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 28%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Master 19 12%
Professor 12 7%
Other 41 25%
Unknown 3 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 45%
Linguistics 22 14%
Social Sciences 12 7%
Computer Science 9 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 14 9%