↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Time to Update and Quantitative Changes in the Results of Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Reviews
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011553
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wanlop Jaidee, David Moher, Malinee Laopaiboon

Abstract

The recommended interval between updates for systematic reviews included in The Cochrane Library is 2 years. However, it is unclear whether this interval is always appropriate. Whereas excessive updating wastes time and resources, insufficient updating allows out-of-date or incomplete evidence to guide clinical decision-making. We set out to determine, for Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews, the frequency of updates, factors associated with updating, and whether updating frequency was appropriate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 7%
United Kingdom 2 5%
Ireland 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 32 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Librarian 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 44%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 20%