| Title |
The Usefulness of Peer Review for Selecting Manuscripts for Publication: A Utility Analysis Taking as an Example a High-Impact Journal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011344 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 48 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 29% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |