↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Is Thermosensing Property of RNA Thermometers Unique?

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Is Thermosensing Property of RNA Thermometers Unique?
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Premal Shah, Michael A. Gilchrist

Abstract

A large number of studies have been dedicated to identify the structural and sequence based features of RNA thermometers, mRNAs that regulate their translation initiation rate with temperature. It has been shown that the melting of the ribosome-binding site (RBS) plays a prominent role in this thermosensing process. However, little is known as to how widespread this melting phenomenon is as earlier studies on the subject have worked with a small sample of known RNA thermometers. We have developed a novel method of studying the melting of RNAs with temperature by computationally sampling the distribution of the RNA structures at various temperatures using the RNA folding software Vienna. In this study, we compared the thermosensing property of 100 randomly selected mRNAs and three well known thermometers--rpoH, ibpA and agsA sequences from E. coli. We also compared the rpoH sequences from 81 mesophilic proteobacteria. Although both rpoH and ibpA show a higher rate of melting at their RBS compared with the mean of non-thermometers, contrary to our expectations these higher rates are not significant. Surprisingly, we also do not find any significant differences between rpoH thermometers from other gamma-proteobacteria and E. coli non-thermometers.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 3%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 55 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 25%
Chemistry 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 6 10%