↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

The Small, Slow and Specialized CRISPR and Anti-CRISPR of Escherichia and Salmonella

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
The Small, Slow and Specialized CRISPR and Anti-CRISPR of Escherichia and Salmonella
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Touchon, Eduardo P. C. Rocha

Abstract

Prokaryotes thrive in spite of the vast number and diversity of their viruses. This partly results from the evolution of mechanisms to inactivate or silence the action of exogenous DNA. Among these, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) are unique in providing adaptive immunity against elements with high local resemblance to genomes of previously infecting agents. Here, we analyze the CRISPR loci of 51 complete genomes of Escherichia and Salmonella. CRISPR are in two pairs of loci in Escherichia, one single pair in Salmonella, each pair showing a similar turnover rate, repeat sequence and putative linkage to a common set of cas genes. Yet, phylogeny shows that CRISPR and associated cas genes have different evolutionary histories, the latter being frequently exchanged or lost. In our set, one CRISPR pair seems specialized in plasmids often matching genes coding for the replication, conjugation and antirestriction machinery. Strikingly, this pair also matches the cognate cas genes in which case these genes are absent. The unexpectedly high conservation of this anti-CRISPR suggests selection to counteract the invasion of mobile elements containing functional CRISPR/cas systems. There are few spacers in most CRISPR, which rarely match genomes of known phages. Furthermore, we found that strains divergent less than 250 thousand years ago show virtually identical CRISPR. The lack of congruence between cas, CRISPR and the species phylogeny and the slow pace of CRISPR change make CRISPR poor epidemiological markers in enterobacteria. All these observations are at odds with the expectedly abundant and dynamic repertoire of spacers in an immune system aiming at protecting bacteria from phages. Since we observe purifying selection for the maintenance of CRISPR these results suggest that alternative evolutionary roles for CRISPR remain to be uncovered.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Canada 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 301 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 22%
Researcher 68 21%
Student > Master 38 11%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 4%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 56 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 59 18%