↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Testing Evolutionary and Dispersion Scenarios for the Settlement of the New World

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Testing Evolutionary and Dispersion Scenarios for the Settlement of the New World
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Hubbe, Walter A. Neves, Katerina Harvati

Abstract

Discussion surrounding the settlement of the New World has recently gained momentum with advances in molecular biology, archaeology and bioanthropology. Recent evidence from these diverse fields is found to support different colonization scenarios. The currently available genetic evidence suggests a "single migration" model, in which both early and later Native American groups derive from one expansion event into the continent. In contrast, the pronounced anatomical differences between early and late Native American populations have led others to propose more complex scenarios, involving separate colonization events of the New World and a distinct origin for these groups.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Chile 3 2%
Germany 3 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 109 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Student > Postgraduate 14 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Other 33 26%
Unknown 8 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 39%
Social Sciences 24 19%
Arts and Humanities 10 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 6%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 13 10%