↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Deathly Drool: Evolutionary and Ecological Basis of Septic Bacteria in Komodo Dragon Mouths

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
12 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
2 Q&A threads

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Deathly Drool: Evolutionary and Ecological Basis of Septic Bacteria in Komodo Dragon Mouths
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011097
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. J. Bull, Tim S. Jessop, Marvin Whiteley

Abstract

Komodo dragons, the world's largest lizard, dispatch their large ungulate prey by biting and tearing flesh. If a prey escapes, oral bacteria inoculated into the wound reputedly induce a sepsis that augments later prey capture by the same or other lizards. However, the ecological and evolutionary basis of sepsis in Komodo prey acquisition is controversial. Two models have been proposed. The "bacteria as venom" model postulates that the oral flora directly benefits the lizard in prey capture irrespective of any benefit to the bacteria. The "passive acquisition" model is that the oral flora of lizards reflects the bacteria found in carrion and sick prey, with no relevance to the ability to induce sepsis in subsequent prey. A third model is proposed and analyzed here, the "lizard-lizard epidemic" model. In this model, bacteria are spread indirectly from one lizard mouth to another. Prey escaping an initial attack act as vectors in infecting new lizards. This model requires specific life history characteristics and ways to refute the model based on these characteristics are proposed and tested. Dragon life histories (some details of which are reported here) prove remarkably consistent with the model, especially that multiple, unrelated lizards feed communally on large carcasses and that escaping, wounded prey are ultimately fed on by other lizards. The identities and evolutionary histories of bacteria in the oral flora may yield the most useful additional insights for further testing the epidemic model and can now be obtained with new technologies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
Germany 2 2%
Romania 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 114 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 24 19%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 57%
Environmental Science 11 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 20 16%