| Title |
Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Donegan, Paula Williamson, Carrol Gamble, Catrin Tudur-Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 23% |
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 25% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 38% |
| Mathematics | 6 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 23% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |