↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

MixHMM: Inferring Copy Number Variation and Allelic Imbalance Using SNP Arrays and Tumor Samples Mixed with Stromal Cells

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
MixHMM: Inferring Copy Number Variation and Allelic Imbalance Using SNP Arrays and Tumor Samples Mixed with Stromal Cells
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zongzhi Liu, Ao Li, Vincent Schulz, Min Chen, David Tuck

Abstract

Genotyping platforms such as single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays are powerful tools to study genomic aberrations in cancer samples. Allele specific information from SNP arrays provides valuable information for interpreting copy number variation (CNV) and allelic imbalance including loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) beyond that obtained from the total DNA signal available from array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) platforms. Several algorithms based on hidden Markov models (HMMs) have been designed to detect copy number changes and copy-neutral LOH making use of the allele information on SNP arrays. However heterogeneity in clinical samples, due to stromal contamination and somatic alterations, complicates analysis and interpretation of these data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 49 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Computer Science 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Mathematics 3 5%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 3 5%