↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Ecosystem Carbon Stock Influenced by Plantation Practice: Implications for Planting Forests as a Measure of Climate Change Mitigation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
277 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Ecosystem Carbon Stock Influenced by Plantation Practice: Implications for Planting Forests as a Measure of Climate Change Mitigation
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010867
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chengzhang Liao, Yiqi Luo, Changming Fang, Bo Li

Abstract

Uncertainties remain in the potential of forest plantations to sequestrate carbon (C). We synthesized 86 experimental studies with paired-site design, using a meta-analysis approach, to quantify the differences in ecosystem C pools between plantations and their corresponding adjacent primary and secondary forests (natural forests). Totaled ecosystem C stock in plant and soil pools was 284 Mg C ha(-1) in natural forests and decreased by 28% in plantations. In comparison with natural forests, plantations decreased aboveground net primary production, litterfall, and rate of soil respiration by 11, 34, and 32%, respectively. Fine root biomass, soil C concentration, and soil microbial C concentration decreased respectively by 66, 32, and 29% in plantations relative to natural forests. Soil available N, P and K concentrations were lower by 22, 20 and 26%, respectively, in plantations than in natural forests. The general pattern of decreased ecosystem C pools did not change between two different groups in relation to various factors: stand age (< 25 years vs. > or = 25 years), stand types (broadleaved vs. coniferous and deciduous vs. evergreen), tree species origin (native vs. exotic) of plantations, land-use history (afforestation vs. reforestation) and site preparation for plantations (unburnt vs. burnt), and study regions (tropic vs. temperate). The pattern also held true across geographic regions. Our findings argued against the replacement of natural forests by the plantations as a measure of climate change mitigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 255 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 17%
Student > Master 42 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Other 17 6%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 110 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 5%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 50 18%