↓ Skip to main content

PLOS

Relationship between Sponsorship and Failure Rate of Dental Implants: A Systematic Approach

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Relationship between Sponsorship and Failure Rate of Dental Implants: A Systematic Approach
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010274
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Popelut, Fabien Valet, Olivier Fromentin, Aurélie Thomas, Philippe Bouchard

Abstract

The number of dental implant treatments increases annually. Dental implants are manufactured by competing companies. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have shown a clear association between pharmaceutical industry funding of clinical trials and pro-industry results. So far, the impact of industry sponsorship on the outcomes and conclusions of dental implant clinical trials has never been explored. The aim of the present study was to examine financial sponsorship of dental implant trials, and to evaluate whether research funding sources may affect the annual failure rate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 15 17%
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 57%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 24%